Paper detail

The Distribution of Gaps between Summands in Generalized Zeckendorf Decompositions

Zeckendorf proved that any integer can be decomposed uniquely as a sum of non-adjacent Fibonacci numbers, $F_n$. Using continued fractions, Lekkerkerker proved the average number of summands of an $m \in [F_n, F_{n+1})$ is essentially $n/(φ^2 +1)$, with $φ$ the golden ratio. Miller-Wang generalized this by adopting a combinatorial perspective, proving that for any positive linear recurrence the number of summands in decompositions for integers in $[G_n, G_{n+1})$ converges to a Gaussian distribution. We prove the probability of a gap larger than the recurrence length converges to decaying geometrically, and that the distribution of the smaller gaps depends in a computable way on the coefficients of the recurrence. These results hold both for the average over all $m \in [G_n, G_{n+1})$, as well as holding almost surely for the gap measure associated to individual $m$. The techniques can also be used to determine the distribution of the longest gap between summands, which we prove is similar to the distribution of the longest gap between heads in tosses of a biased coin. It is a double exponential strongly concentrated about the mean, and is on the order of $\log n$ with computable constants depending on the recurrence.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.