Paper detail

The distinguishing factor for gravity models: stellar population synthesis

Alternative gravitations of Milgrom (MOND), Moffat (MOG), and CDM scenarios all simulate rotation curves of spirals with reasonable details. They display significant disparities however in predicting the stellar mass-to-light ($M_*/L$) ratios of the galaxies. We maintain this feature could serve as a distinguishing factor between different alternative theories. We analyze the rotation curves of 46 low- and high-surface brightness galaxies and compare the resulting $M_*/L$s with the predictions of the Stellar Population Synthesis (SPS) scheme. The color-$M_*/L$ correlation obtained for MOND is consistent with predictions of SPS models. MOG does not show this consistency, and the $M_*/L$s of CDM model shows large dispersions. Furthermore, $M_*/L$ ratios of MOND with Bekenstein interpolating function favor Kroupa's initial mass function (IMF) of the SPS scheme, while those of MOND with standard and simple interpolating functions are consistent with Salpeter's IMF. Here is another indication to differentiate between different IMFs that are used in SPS context.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.