Paper detail

The Disruption of Giant Molecular Clouds by Radiation Pressure and the Efficiency of Star Formation in Galaxies

Star formation is slow, in the sense that the gas consumption time is much longer than the dynamical time. It is also inefficient; essentially all star formation in local galaxies takes place in giant molecular clouds (GMCs), but the fraction of a GMC converted to stars is very small, ~5%. In the most luminous starbursts, the GMC lifetime is shorter than the main sequence lifetime of even the most massive stars, so that supernovae can play no role in GMC disruption. We investigate the disruption of GMCs across a wide range of galaxies, from normal spirals to the densest starbursts; we take into account the effects of HII gas pressure, shocked stellar winds, protostellar jets, and radiation pressure produced by the absorption and scattering of starlight on dust grains. In the Milky Way, we find that a combination of three mechanisms, jets, HII gas pressure, and radiation pressure, disrupts the clouds. In more rapidly star forming galaxies such as ``clump'' galaxies at high-redshift, ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) and submillimeter galaxies, radiation pressure dominates natal cloud distribution. We predict the presence of 10-20 clusters with masses ~10^7 Msun in local ULIRGs such as Arp 220 and a similar number of clusters with M_* ~ 10^8 Msun in high redshift clump galaxies; submillimeter galaxies will have even more massive clusters. We find that the mass fraction of a GMC that ends up in stars is an increasing function of the gas surface density of a galaxy, reaching ~35% in the most luminous starbursts. Furthermore, the disruption of bubbles by radiation pressure stirs the interstellar medium to velocities of ~10 km/s in normal galaxies and to ~100 km/s in ULIRGs like Arp 220, consistent with observations. Thus, radiation pressure may play a dominant role in the ISM of star-forming galaxies.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.