Paper detail

The Disordered Heterogeneous Universe: Galaxy Distribution and Clustering Across Length Scales

Studies of disordered heterogeneous media and galaxy cosmology share a common goal: analyzing the distribution of particles at `microscales' to predict physical properties at `macroscales', whether for a liquid, composite material, or entire Universe. The former theory provides an array of techniques to characterize a wide class of microstructures; in this work, we apply them to the distributions of galaxies. We focus on the lower-order correlation functions, `void' and `particle' nearest-neighbor functions, pair-connectedness functions, percolation properties, and a scalar order metric. Compared to homogeneous Poisson and typical disordered systems, the cosmological simulations exhibit enhanced large-scale clustering and longer tails in the nearest-neighbor functions, due to the presence of quasi-long-range correlations. On large scales, the system appears `hyperuniform', due to primordial density fluctuations, whilst on the smallest scales, the system becomes almost `antihyperuniform', and, via the order metric, is shown to be a highly correlated disordered system. Via a finite scaling analysis, we show that the percolation threshold of the galaxy catalogs is significantly lower than for Poisson realizations; this is consistent with the observation that the galaxy distribution contains larger voids. However, the two sets of simulations share a fractal dimension, implying that they lie in the same universality class. Finally, we consider the ability of large-scale clustering statistics to constrain cosmological parameters using simulation-based inference. Both the nearest-neighbor distribution and pair-connectedness function considerably tighten bounds on the amplitude of cosmological fluctuations at a level equivalent to observing twenty-five times more galaxies. These are a useful alternative to the three-particle correlation, and are computable in much reduced time. (Abridged)

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.