Paper detail

The DiskMass Survey. VII. The distribution of luminous and dark matter in spiral galaxies

We present dynamically-determined rotation-curve mass decompositions of 30 spiral galaxies, which were carried out to test the maximum-disk hypothesis and to quantify properties of their dark-matter (DM) halos. We used measured vertical velocity dispersions of the disk stars to calculate dynamical mass surface densities. Together with our atomic and molecular gas mass surface densities, we derived the stellar mass surface densities, and thus have absolute measurements of all dominant baryonic components. Using K-band surface brightness profiles, we calculated the K-band mass-to-light ratio of the stellar disks (M/L). Our result is consistent with all galaxies in the sample having equal M/L, with a sample average and scatter of <M/L>=0.31+/-0.07. Rotation-curves of the baryonic components were calculated from their mass surface densities, and used with circular-speed measurements to derive the structural parameters of the DM halos, modeled as either a pseudo-isothermal sphere (pISO) or an NFW halo. All galaxies in our sample are submaximal, such that at 2.2 disk scale lengths (hR) the ratios between the baryonic and total rotation-curves (Fb^{2.2hR}) are less than 0.75. We find this ratio to be nearly constant between 1-6 hR within individual galaxies. We find a sample average and scatter of <Fb^{2.2hR}>=0.57+/-0.07, with trends of larger Fb^{2.2hR} for more luminous and higher-surface-brightness galaxies. To enforce these being maximal, we need to scale M/L by a factor 3.6 on average. The DM rotation curves are marginally better fit by a pISO than by an NFW halo. For the nominal-M/L (submaximal) case, the derived NFW-halo parameters have values consistent with LCDM N-body simulations, suggesting that the baryonic matter has only had a minor effect on the DM distribution. In contrast, maximum-M/L decompositions yield halo concentrations that are too low compared to the LCDM simulations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.