Paper detail

The Disk Wind in the Rapidly Spinning Stellar-Mass Black Hole 4U 1630-472 Observed with NuSTAR

We present an analysis of a short NuSTAR observation of the stellar-mass black hole and low-mass X-ray binary 4U 1630$-$472. Reflection from the inner accretion disk is clearly detected for the first time in this source, owing to the sensitivity of NuSTAR. With fits to the reflection spectrum, we find evidence for a rapidly spinning black hole, $a_{*}=0.985^{+0.005}_{-0.014}$ ($1σ$ statistical errors). However, archival data show that the source has relatively low radio luminosity. Recently claimed relationships between jet power and black hole spin would predict either a lower spin or a higher peak radio luminosity. We also report the clear detection of an absorption feature at $7.03\pm0.03$ keV, likely signaling a disk wind. If this line arises in dense, moderately ionized gas ($\logξ=3.6^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$) and is dominated by He-like Fe XXV, the wind has a velocity of $v/c=0.043^{+0.002}_{-0.007}$ (12900$^{+600}_{-2100}$ km s$^{-1}$). If the line is instead associated with a more highly ionized gas ($\logξ=6.1^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$), and is dominated by Fe XXVI, evidence of a blue-shift is only marginal, after taking systematic errors into account. Our analysis suggests the ionized wind may be launched within 200$-$1100 Rg, and may be magnetically driven.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access17 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.