Paper detail

The discriminant power of RNA features for pre-miRNA recognition

Computational discovery of microRNAs (miRNA) is based on pre-determined sets of features from miRNA precursors (pre-miRNA). These feature sets used by current tools for pre-miRNA recognition differ in construction and dimension. Some feature sets are composed of sequence-structure patterns commonly found in pre-miRNAs, while others are a combination of more sophisticated RNA features. Current tools achieve similar predictive performance even though the feature sets used - and their computational cost - differ widely. In this work, we analyze the discriminant power of seven feature sets, which are used in six pre-miRNA prediction tools. The analysis is based on the classification performance achieved with these feature sets for the training algorithms used in these tools. We also evaluate feature discrimination through the F-score and feature importance in the induction of random forests. More diverse feature sets produce classifiers with significantly higher classification performance compared to feature sets composed only of sequence-structure patterns. However, small or non-significant differences were found among the estimated classification performances of classifiers induced using sets with diversification of features, despite the wide differences in their dimension. Based on these results, we applied a feature selection method to reduce the computational cost of computing the feature set, while maintaining discriminant power. We obtained a lower-dimensional feature set, which achieved a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 95%. Our feature set achieves a sensitivity and specificity within 0.1% of the maximal values obtained with any feature set while it is 34x faster to compute. Even compared to another feature set, which is the computationally least expensive feature set of those from the literature which perform within 0.1% of the maximal values, it is 34x faster to compute.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.