Paper detail

The Discrete and Semi-continuous Fréchet Distance with Shortcuts via Approximate Distance Counting and Selection Techniques

The \emph{Fréchet distance} is a well studied similarity measures between curves. The \emph{discrete Fréchet distance} is an analogous similarity measure, defined for a sequence $A$ of $m$ points and a sequence $B$ of $n$ points, where the points are usually sampled from input curves. In this paper we consider a variant, called the \emph{discrete Fréchet distance with shortcuts}, which captures the similarity between (sampled) curves in the presence of outliers. For the \emph{two-sided} case, where shortcuts are allowed in both curves, we give an $O((m^{2/3}n^{2/3}+m+n)\log^3 (m+n))$-time algorithm for computing this distance. When shortcuts are allowed only in one noise-containing curve, we give an even faster randomized algorithm that runs in $O((m+n)^{6/5+\varepsilon})$ expected time, for any $\varepsilon>0$. Our techniques are novel and may find further applications. One of the main new technical results is: Given two sets of points $A$ and $B$ and an interval $I$, we develop an algorithm that decides whether the number of pairs $(x,y)\in A\times B$ whose distance ${\rm dist}(x,y)$ is in $I$, is less than some given threshold $L$. The running time of this algorithm decreases as $L$ increases. In case there are more than $L$ pairs of points whose distance is in $I$, we can get a small sample of pairs that contains a pair at approximate median distance (i.e., we can approximately "bisect" $I$). We combine this procedure with additional ideas to search, with a small overhead, for the optimal one-sided Fréchet distance with shortcuts, using a very fast decision procedure. We also show how to apply this technique for approximating distance selection (with respect to rank), and for computing the semi-continuous Fréchet distance with one-sided shortcuts.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.