Paper detail

The Discovery of a High-redshift Quasar without Emission Lines from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Commissioning Data

We report observations of a luminous unresolved object at redshift z = 4.62, with a featureless optical spectrum redward of the Lyman alpha forest region, discovered from Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) commissioning data. The redshift is determined by the onset of the Lyman-alpha forest at lambda ~ 6800 A, and a Lyman Limit System at lambda = 5120 A. A strong Ly_alpha absorption system with weak metal absorption lines at z=4.58 is also identified in the spectrum. The object has a continuum absolute magnitude of -26.6 at 1450 A in the rest-frame (h_0=0.5, q_0=0.5), and therefore cannot be an ordinary galaxy. It shows no radio emission (the 3-sigma upper limit of its flux at 6 cm is 60 micron Jy), indicating an radio-to-optical flux ratio at least as small as that of the radio-weakest known BL Lacs. It is also not linearly polarized in the observed I band to a 3-sigma upper limit of 4%. Therefore, it is either the most distant BL Lac object known to date, with very weak radio emission, or a new type of unbeamed quasar, whose broad emission-line region is very weak or absent.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.