Paper detail

The Dirichlet Property for Tensor Algebras

We prove that the tensor algebra of a C*-correspondence $X$ is Dirichlet if and only if $X$ is a Hilbert bimodule. As a consequence, we point out and fix an error appearing in the proof of a famous result of Duncan. Secondly we answer a question raised by Davidson and Katsoulis concerning tensor algebras and semi-Dirichlet algebras, by giving an example of a Dirichlet algebra that cannot be described as the tensor algebra of any C*-correspondence. Furthermore we show that the adding tail technique, as extended by the author and Katsoulis, applies in a unique way to preserve the class of Hilbert bimodules. The exploitation of these ideas implies that the tensor algebra of row-finite graphs, the tensor algebra of multivariable automorphic $\ca$- dynamics and Peters' semicrossed product of an injective $\ca$-dynamical system have the unique extension property. The two latter provide examples of non-separable operator algebras that admit a Choquet boundary in the sense of Arveson.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.