Paper detail

The Dirichlet curve of a probability in $\mathbb{R}^d$

If $α$ is a probability on $\mathbb{R}^d$ and $t>0,$ consider the Dirichlet random probability $P_t\sim\mathcal{D}(tα) ;$ it is such that for any measurable partition $(A_0,\ldots,A_k)$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$ then $(P_t(A_0),\ldots,P_t(A_k))$ is Dirichlet distributed with parameters $(tα(A_0)\ldots,tα(A_k)).$ If $\int_{\mathbb{R}^d}\log(1+\|x\|)α(dx)<\infty$ the random variable $\int_{\mathbb{R}^d}xP_t(dx)$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$ does exist and we denote by $μ(tα)$ its distribution. The Dirichlet curve associated to the probability $α$ is the map $t\mapsto μ(tα).$ It has simple properties like $\lim_{t\searrow 0}μ(tα)=α$ and $\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty}μ(tα)=δ_m$ when $m=\int_{\mathbb{R}^d} xα(dx)$ exists. The present paper shows first that if $m$ exists and if $ψ$ is a convex function on $\mathbb{R}^d$ then $t\mapsto \int_{\mathbb{R}^d}ψ(x)μ(tα)(dx)$ is a decreasing function, which means that $t\mapsto μ(tα)$ is decreasing according to the Strassen convex order of probabilities. The second aim of the paper is to prove a group of results around the following question: if $μ(tα)=μ(sα)$ for some $0\leq s<t$, can we claim that $μ$ is Cauchy distributed in $\mathbb{R}^d?$

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.