Paper detail

The Direct Detectability of Giant Exoplanets in the Optical

Motivated by the possibility that a coronagraph will be put on WFIRST/AFTA, we explore the direct detectability of extrasolar giant planets (EGPs) in the optical. We quantify a planet's detectability by the fraction of its orbit for which it is in an observable configuration ($f_\mathrm{obs}$). Using a suite of Monte Carlo experiments, we study the dependence of $f_\mathrm{obs}$ upon the inner working angle (IWA) and minimum achievable contrast ($C_\mathrm{min}$) of the direct-imaging observatory; the planet's phase function, geometric albedo, single-scattering albedo, radius, and distance from Earth; and the semi-major axis distribution of EGPs. We calculate phase functions for a given geometric or single-scattering albedo, assuming various scattering mechanisms. We find that the Lambertian phase function can predict significantly larger $f_\mathrm{obs}$'s with respect to the more realistic Rayleigh phase function. For observations made with WFIRST/AFTA's baseline capabilities ($C_\mathrm{min}\sim10^{-9}$, $\mathrm{IWA}\sim0.2''$), Jupiter-like planets orbiting stars within 10, 30, and 50 parsecs of Earth have volume-averaged observability fractions of ${\sim}$12%, 3%, and 0.5%, respectively. At 10 parsecs, such observations yield $f_\mathrm{obs}>1\%$ for low- to modest-eccentricity planets with semi-major axes in the range ${\sim}2 - 10$ AU. If $C_\mathrm{min}=10^{-10}$, this range extends to ${\sim}35$ AU. We find that, in all but the most optimistic configurations, the probability for detection in a blind search is low (${<}\,5\%$). However, with orbital parameter constraints from long-term radial-velocity campaigns and Gaia astrometry, the tools we develop in this work can be used to determine both the most promising systems to target and when to observe them.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.