Paper detail

The Differences between Analytical and Numerical Ignition Curve of He-C-O Mixture

In this paper, we use large reaction networks to find ignition conditions of single-zone nuclear fuel with compositions typical of white dwarf (WD) matter. The necessary but, possibly not sufficient condition for initiation of detonation is that the nuclear burning proceeds on smaller timescale than the sound-crossing timescale. Under typical white dwarf thermodynamic conditions, the nuclear timescale depends sensitively on the chosen nuclear reaction network, and widely-used analytical formulae are not sufficient to accurately determine unstable ignition conditions the answer to which lies in the fully compressible reactive turbulent simulations. We model the nuclear reactions in the numerical simulation using the astrophysical code TORCH. We report the differences introduced due to the size of the nuclear reaction network. Our findings have implications for numerical results obtained using the popular 19-species network in multidimensional simulations of WD of Chandrasekhar and sub-Chandrasekhar masses. We present a sufficiently accurate general criterion in temperature-density ($T-ρ$) plane for a given initial fuel to ignite in an unstable fashion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.