Paper detail

The Difference in Narrow Fe KαLine Emission Between Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 2 Galaxies

We compile a sample of 89 Seyfert galaxies with both [OIV] 25.89 um line luminosities observed by Spitzer IRS and X-ray spectra observed by XMM EPIC. Using [OIV] emission as proxy of AGN intrinsic luminosity, we find that although type 2 AGNs have higher line equivalent width, the narrow Fe Kalpha line in Compton-Thin and Compton-Thick Seyfert 2 galaxies are 2.9 +0.8 -0.6 and 5.6 +1.9 -1.4 times weaker in terms of luminosity than Seyfert 1 galaxies respectively. This indicates different correction factors need to be applied for various types of AGNs before the narrow Fe Kalpha line luminosity could serve as intrinsic AGN luminosity indicator. We also find Seyfert 1 galaxies in our sample have on average marginally larger line width and higher line centroid energy, suggesting contamination from highly ionized Fe line or broader line emission from much smaller radius, but this effect is too weak to explain the large difference in narrow Fe Kalpha line luminosity between type 1 and type 2 AGNs. This is the first observational evidence showing the narrow Fe Kalpha line emission in AGNs is anisotropic. The observed difference is consistent with theoretical calculations assuming a smoothly distributed obscuring torus, and could provide independent constraints on the clumpiness of the torus.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.