Paper detail

The dielectric functions and optical band gaps of thin films of amorphous and cubic crystalline Mg~2NiH~4

Magnesium nickel hydride films have earlier been suggested for several optoelectronic applications, but the optical properties and band gap have not been firmly established. In this work, the dielectric functions and the optical band gaps of thin films of Mg2NiH4 have been determined experimentally from optical modeling using spectroscopic ellipsometry and spectrophotometry in the photon energy range between 0.7 and 4.2 eV. Samples were prepared by reactive sputtering, resulting in a single-layer geometry that could easily be studied by ellipsometry. Crystalline samples were prepared by annealing the amorphous films ex-situ. The resulting films remained in the high temperature cubic Mg2NiH4 structure even after cooling to room temperature. Tauc analysis of the dielectric function shows that Mg2NiH4 exhibits a band gap of 1.6 eV for amorphous structure films and 2.1 eV for its cubic crystalline structure.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.