Paper detail

The determinant bound for discrepancy is almost tight

In 1986 Lovasz, Spencer, and Vesztergombi proved a lower bound for the hereditary a discrepancy of a set system F in terms of determinants of square submatrices of the incidence matrix of F. As shown by an example of Hoffman, this bound can differ from herdisc(F) by a multiplicative factor of order almost log n, where n is the size of the ground set of F. We prove that it never differs by more than O((log n)3/2), assuming |F| bounded by a polynomial in n. We also prove that if such an F is the union of t systems F_1, . . ., F_t, each of hereditary discrepancy at most D, then herdisc(F) \leq O(t^(1/2)(log n)^(3/2) D). For t = 2, this almost answers a question of Sos. The proof is based on a recent algorithmic result of Bansal, which computes low-discrepancy colorings using semidefinite programming.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.