Paper detail

The detection rate of Inspiral and Quasi-normal modes of Pop III binary black holes which can confirm or refute the General Relativity in the strong gravity region

Using our population synthesis code, we found that the typical chirp mass of Pop III BH-BHs is $\sim30~\msun$ with the total mass of $\sim60~\msun$ so that the inspiral chirp signal as well as quasi normal mode (QNM) of the merging BH are interesting targets of KAGRA. The detection rate of the coalescing Pop III BH-BHs is $\sim$180 $\rm events~yr^{-1}$$(\rm SFR_p/(10^{-2.5}~\msun \rm~yr^{-1}~Mpc^{-3}))\cdot([f_b/(1+f_b)]/0.33)\cdot Err_{sys}$ in our standard model where $\rm SFR_{p},~f_b$ and $\rm Err_{sys}$ are the peak value of the Pop III star formation rate, the binary fraction and the systematic error with $\rm Err_{sys}=1$ for our standard model, respectively. To evaluate the robustness of chirp mass distribution and the range of $\rm Err_{sys}$, we examine the dependence of the results on the unknown parameters and the distribution functions. We found that the chirp mass has a peak at $\sim 30 ~\msun$ in most of parameters and distribution functions as well as $\rm Err_{sys}$ ranges from 0.046 to 4. The minimum rate corresponds to the worst model which we think unlikely so that unless $ {\rm ~(SFR_p/(10^{-2.5}~\msun~yr^{-1}~Mpc^{-3}))\cdot([f_b/(1+f_b)]/0.33) \ll 0.1}$, we expect the Pop III BH-BHs merger rate of at least one event per year by KAGRA. Nakano, Tanaka \& Nakamura (2015) show that if S/N of QNM is larger than 35, we can confirm or refute the General Relativity (GR) more than 5 sigma level. In our standard model, the detection rate of Pop III BH-BHs whose S/N is larger than 35 is $3.2~\rm events~yr^{-1}$$(\rm SFR_p/(10^{-2.5}~\msun \rm~yr^{-1}~Mpc^{-3}))\cdot([f_b/(1+f_b)]/0.33)\cdot Err_{sys}$. Thus, there is a good chance to check whether GR is correct or not in the strong gravity region.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.