Paper detail

The Detection of [O III]$λ$4363 in a Lensed, Dwarf Galaxy at $z$ = 2.59: Testing Metallicity Indicators and Scaling Relations at High Redshift and Low Mass

We present Keck/MOSFIRE and Keck/LRIS spectroscopy of A1689-217, a lensed (magnification $\sim7.9$), star-forming (SFR $\sim$ 16 $\rm M_\odot\ yr^{-1}$), dwarf (log($M_\ast/M_\odot$) = $8.07-8.59$), Ly$α$-emitter ($\rm EW_0\sim138$ A) at $z$ = 2.5918. Dwarf galaxies similar to A1689-217 are common at high redshift and likely responsible for reionization, yet few have been studied with detailed spectroscopy. We report a 4.2$σ$ detection of the electron-temperature-sensitive [O III]$λ$4363 emission line and use this line to directly measure an oxygen abundance of 12+$\log$(O/H) = 8.06 $\pm$ 0.12 ($\sim1/4\ \rm Z_\odot$). A1689-217 is the lowest mass galaxy at $z>$ 2 with an [O III]$λ$4363 detection. Using the rest-optical emission lines, we measure A1689-217's other nebular conditions including electron temperature ($T_e$([O III]) $\sim$ 14,000 K), electron density ($n_e\sim$ 220 $\rm cm^{-3}$) and reddening ($E(B-V)\sim$ 0.39). We study relations between strong-line ratios and direct metallicities with A1689-217 and other galaxies with [O III]$λ$4363 detections at $z\sim0-3.1$, showing that the locally-calibrated, oxygen-based, strong-line relations are consistent from $z\sim0-3.1$. We also show additional evidence that the $\rm O_{32}$ vs. $\rm R_{23}$ excitation diagram can be utilized as a redshift-invariant, direct-metallicity-based, oxygen abundance diagnostic out to $z\sim$ 3.1. From this excitation diagram and the strong-line ratio $-$ metallicity plots, we observe that the ionization parameter at fixed O/H is consistent with no redshift evolution. Although A1689-217 is metal-rich for its $M_\ast$ and SFR, we find it to be consistent within the large scatter of the low-mass end of the Fundamental Metallicity Relation.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.