Paper detail

The Detailed Photometric and Spectroscopic Study of the 2011 Outburst of the Recurrent Nova T Pyxidis from 0.8 to 250 Days after Discovery

We investigated the optical lightcurve of T Pyx during its 2011 outburst by compiling a database of SMEI and AAVSO observations. The SMEI lightcurve, providing unprecedented detail covering 1.5-49d post-discovery, was divided into four phases based on the idealised CN optical lightcurve; the initial rise (1.5-3.3d), the pre-maximum halt (3.3-13.3d), the final rise (14.7-27.9d), and the early decline (27.9d-). The SMEI lightcurve contains a strongly detected period of 1.44+/-0.05d during the pre-maximum phase. These oscillations resemble those found in TNR models arising from instabilities in the expanding envelope. No spectral variation mirroring the lightcurve periodicity was found. A marked dip at 22-24d just before maximum light (27.9d) may represent the same phenomenon seen in novae observed by SMEI. Spectra from the Liverpool Telescope and SMARTS 1.5m were obtained from 0.8-80.7 and 155.1-249.9d, covering the major phases of development. A distinct high velocity ejection phase was evident during the early rise (V~4000 km/s). A marked drop at 5.7d, and then a gradual increase occurred in the ejection velocity which stabilised at ~1500 km/s at the pre-maximum halt. Here we propose two stages of mass loss, a short-lived phase occurring immediately after outburst, lasting ~6d, followed by a steadily evolving and higher mass loss phase. The overall spectral development follows that typical of a CN and comparison with the photometric behaviour reveals consistencies with the evolving pseudo-photosphere model of a CN outburst. Comparing optical spectra to X-ray and radio lightcurves, weak [Fe X] 6375 Angstrom emission was marginally detected before the X-ray rise and was clearly present during the brightest phase of X-ray emission. If the onset of the X-ray phase and the start of the optical final decline are related to the cessation of significant mass loss, then this occurred at 90-110d.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.