Paper detail

The dependency of AGN infrared color-selection on source luminosity and obscuration: An observational perspective in CDFS and COSMOS

AIMS. This work addresses the AGN IR-selection dependency on intrinsic source luminosity and obscuration, in order to identify and charaterise biases which could affect conclusions in studies. METHODS. We study IR-selected AGN in the Chandra Deep Field South (CDFS) survey and in the Cosmological Survey (COSMOS). The AGN sample is divided into low and high X-ray luminosity classes, and into unobscured (type-1) and obscured (type-2) classes by means of X-ray and optical spectroscopy data. Specifically in the X-rays regime, we adopt the intrinsic luminosity taking into account the estimated column density (N_H). We also take the chance to highlight important differences resulting from adopting different methods to assess AGN obscuration. RESULTS. In agreement with previous studies, we also find that AGN IR-selection efficiency shows a decrease with decreasing source AGN X-ray luminosity. For the intermediate-luminosity AGN population (43.3<~log(L_X[erg/s])<~44$), the efficiency also worsens with increasing obscuration. The same sample also shows an evolution with cosmic time of the obscured fraction at the highest X-ray luminosities, independently of adopted type-1/type-2 classification method. CONCLUSIONS. We confirm that AGN IR-selection is genuinely biased toward unobscured AGN, but only at intermediate luminosities. At the highest luminosities, where AGN IR-selection is more efficient, there is no obscuration bias. We show that type-1 AGN are intrinsically more luminous than type-2 AGN only at z<~1.6, thus resulting in more type-1 AGN being selected the shallower the IR survey is. [ABRIDGED: Conclusion on survey strategy. See manuscript.] Finally, when the James Webb Space Telescope comes online, the broad-band filters 2.0um, 4.4um, 7.7um, and 18um will be key to disentangle AGN from non-AGN dominated SEDs at depths where spectroscopy becomes impractical.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.