Paper detail

The dependence of dark matter profiles on the stellar to halo mass ratio: a prediction for cusps vs cores

We use 31 simulated galaxies from the MaGICC project to investigate the effects of baryonic feedback on the density profiles of dark matter (DM) haloes. The sample covers a wide mass range: 9.4e9<Mhalo/Msun<7.8e11, hosting galaxies with stellar masses: 5.0e5<M*/Msun<8.3e10, i.e. from dwarf to L*. The galaxies are simulated with several baryonic prescriptions, including a range of stellar feedbacks. The main result is a clear dependence of the inner slope of the DM density profile, α in ρr^α, on the ratio between stellar-to-halo mass (M*/Mhalo). This relation is independent of the stellar feedback scheme, allowing a prediction for cusp vs core formation. When M*/Mhalo is low, ~0.01%, energy from stellar feedback is insufficient to significantly alter the inner DM density and the galaxy retains a cuspy profile. At higher M*/Mhalo, feedback drives the expansion of the DM and generates cored profiles. The flattest profiles form where M*/Mhalo~0.5%. Above this ratio, stars formed in the central regions deepen the gravitational potential enough to oppose this supernova-driven expansion process, resulting in smaller cores and cuspier profiles. Combining the dependence of α on M*/Mhalo with the abundance matching relation between M* and Mhalo provides a prediction for how α varies with M*. Further, using the Tully-Fisher relation allows a prediction for the dependence of the DM inner slope on the observed rotation velocity of galaxies. The most cored galaxies are expected to have Vrot~50km/s, with α decreasing for more massive disc galaxies: spirals with Vrot~150km/s have central slopes α<-0.8, approaching the NFW profile. This novel prediction for the dependence of α on disc galaxy mass can be tested using current observational data sets, and can be applied to theoretical modeling of mass profiles and populations of disc galaxies.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.