Paper detail

The dependence of convective core overshooting on stellar mass

Convective core overshooting extends the main-sequence lifetime of a star. Evolutionary tracks computed with overshooting are quite different from those that use the classical Schwarzschild criterion, which leads to rather different predictions for the stellar properties. Attempts over the last two decades to calibrate the degree of overshooting with stellar mass using detached double-lined eclipsing binaries have been largely inconclusive, mainly due to a lack of suitable observational data. Here we revisit the question of a possible mass dependence of overshooting with a more complete sample of binaries, and examine any additional relation there might be with evolutionary state or metal abundance Z. We use a carefully selected sample of 33 double-lined eclipsing binaries strategically positioned in the H-R diagram, with accurate absolute dimensions and component masses ranging from 1.2 to 4.4 solar masses. We compare their measured properties with stellar evolution calculations to infer semi-empirical values of the overshooting parameter alpha(ov) for each star. Our models use the common prescription for the overshoot distance d(ov) = alpha(ov) Hp, where Hp is the pressure scale height at the edge of the convective core as given by the Schwarzschild criterion, and alpha(ov) is a free parameter. We find a relation between alpha(ov) and mass that is defined much more clearly than in previous work, and indicates a significant rise up to about 2 solar masses followed by little or no change beyond this mass. No appreciable dependence is seen with evolutionary state at a given mass, or with metallicity at a given mass despite the fact that the stars in our sample span a range of a factor of ten in [Fe/H], from -1.01 to +0.01.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.