Paper detail

The density structure around quasars from optical depth statistics

We present a method for studying the proximity effect and the density structure around redshift z=2-3 quasars. It is based on the probability distribution of Lyman-alpha pixel optical depths and its evolution with redshift. We validate the method using mock spectra obtained from hydrodynamical simulations, and then apply it to a sample of 12 bright quasars at redshifts 2-3 observed with UVES at the VLT-UT2 Kueyen ESO telescope. These quasars do not show signatures of associated absorption and have a mean monochromatic luminosity of 5.4 10^{31} h^{-2} erg/s/Hz at the Lyman limit. The observed distribution of optical depth within 10 Mpc/h from the QSO is statistically different from that measured in the general intergalactic medium at the same redshift. Such a change will result from the combined effects of the increase in photoionisation rate above the mean UV-background due to the extra ionizing photons from the quasar radiation (proximity effect), and the higher density of the IGM if the quasars reside in overdense regions (as expected from biased galaxy formation). The first factor decreases the optical depth whereas the second one increases the optical depth, but our measurement cannot distinguish a high background from a low overdensity. An overdensity of the order of a few is required if we use the amplitude of the UV-background inferred from the mean Lyman-$α$ opacity. If no overdensity is present, then we require the UV-background to be higher, and consistent with the existing measurements based on standard analysis of the proximity effect.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.