Paper detail

The density of extremely red objects around high-z radio-loud AGN

We present the results of a K-band imaging survey of 40 arcmin^{2} in fields around 14 radio-loud AGN (6 radio galaxies and 8 quasars) with z>1.5. The survey, 80% complete to K<19.2 and complemented by R-band imaging, aimed at investigating whether extremely red objects (EROs) are present in excess around high-z AGN, and to study the environment of z>1.5 radio galaxies and radio-loud quasars. At $18<K<19$ the differential galaxy counts in our fields suggest a systematic excess over the general field counts. At K<19.2, we find an excess of galaxies with R-K>6 compared to the general field. Consistently, we also find that the R-K colour distribution of all the galaxies in the AGN fields are significantly redder than the colour distribution of the field galaxies. On the other hand, the distribution of the R-K colours is undistinguishable from that of galaxies taken from literature fields around radio-loud quasars at 1<z<2. We discuss the main implications of our findings and we compare the possible scenarios which could explain our results.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.