Paper detail

The degenerative evolution from multicellularity to unicellularity during cancer

Theoretical reasoning suggests that human cancer may result from knocking down the genetic constraints evolved for maintenance of the metazoan multicellularity, which, however, requires a critical test. Using xenograft-based experimental evolution we characterized for the first time the full life history from initiation to metastasis of a tumor at the genomic and transcriptomic levels, and observed metastasis-driving positive selection for generally loss-of-function mutations on a set of multicellularity-related genes, which is further supported by large-scale exome data of clinical tumor samples. Subsequent expression analysis revealed mainly expression down-regulation of multicellularity-related genes, which form an evolving expression profile approaching that of embryonic stem cells, the cell type with the most characteristics of unicellular life. The theoretical conjecture predicts that genes born at the emergence of metazoan multicellularity tend to be cancer drivers, which we validated using a rigorous phylostratigraphy analysis on the birth rate of genes annotated by Cancer Gene Census. Also, the number of loss-of-function tumor suppressors often predominates over activated oncogenes in a typical tumor of human patients. These data collectively suggest that, different from typical organismal evolution in which gain of new genes is the mainstream, cancer represents a loss-of-function-driven degenerative evolution back to the unicellular ground state. This cancer evolution model may explain the enormous tumoral genetic heterogeneity in the clinic, underlie how distant-organ metastases originate in primary tumors despite distinct environmental requirements, and hold implications for designing effective cancer therapy.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.