Paper detail

The Degeneracy of Galaxy Formation Models

We develop a new formalism for modeling the formation and evolution of galaxies within a hierarchical universe. Similarly to standard semi-analytical models we trace galaxies inside dark-matter merger-trees. The formalism includes treatment of feedback, star-formation, cooling, smooth accretion, gas stripping in satellite galaxies, and merger-induced star bursts. However, unlike in other models, each process is assumed to have an efficiency which depends only on the host halo mass and redshift. This allows us to describe the various components of the model in a simple and transparent way. By allowing the efficiencies to have any value for a given halo mass and redshift, we can easily encompass a large range of scenarios. To demonstrate this point, we examine several different galaxy formation models, which are all consistent with the observational data. Each model is characterized by a different unique feature: cold accretion in low mass haloes, zero feedback, stars formed only in merger-induced bursts, and shutdown of star-formation after mergers. Using these models we are able to examine the degeneracy inherent in galaxy formation models, and look for observational data that will help to break this degeneracy. We show that the full distribution of star-formation rates in a given stellar mass bin is promising in constraining the models. We compare our approach in detail to the semi-analytical model of De Lucia & Blaizot. It is shown that our formalism is able to produce a very similar population of galaxies once the same median efficiencies per halo mass and redshift are being used. We provide a public version of the model galaxies on our web-page, along with a tool for running models with user-defined parameters. Our model is able to provide results for a 62.5 h^{-1} Mpc box within just a few seconds.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.