Paper detail

The degeneracy between the dust colour temperature and the spectral index. The problem of multiple chi^2 minima

Because of the Herschel and Planck satellite missions, there is strong interest in the interpretation the sub-millimetre dust spectra from interstellar clouds. Much work has been done to understand the dependence between the spectral index beta_Obs and the colour temperature T_C that is partly caused by the noise. The (T_C, beta_Obs) confidence regions are elongated, banana-shaped structures. We studied under which conditions these exhibit anomalous, strongly non-Gaussian behaviour that could affect the interpretation of the observed (T_C, beta_Obs) relations. We examined modified black body spectra and spectra calculated from radiative transfer models of filamentary clouds at wavelengths 100um-850um. We performed modified black body fits and examined the structure of the chi^2(T_, beta_Obs) function. We show cases where, when the signal-to-noise ratio is low, the chi^2 has multiple local minima in the (T_C, beta_Obs) plane. A small change in the weighting of the data points can cause the solution to jump to completely different values. In particular, noise can lead to the appearance of a separate population of solutions with low colour temperatures and high spectral indices. The anomalies are caused by the noise but the tendency to show multiple chi^2 minima depends on the model and the wavelengths analysed. Deviations from the assumed single modified black body spectrum are not important. The presence of local minima implies that the results obtained from the chi^2 minimisation depend on the starting point of the optimisation and may correspond to non-global minima. The (T_C,beta_Obs) distributions may be contaminated by a few solutions with unrealistically low colour temperatures and high spectral indices. Proper weighting must be applied to avoid the determination of the beta_Obs(T_C) relation to be unduly affected by these measurements.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.