Paper detail

The decays $Λ_{b,c}\to N^*\, l\,ν$ in QCD

We present an exploratory study of the $Λ_{c,b}\to N^*$-form factors and the semileptonic decay width within the framework of light-cone sum rules. We use two different methods and two different interpolating currents for the $Λ_{c,b}$. As interpolating currents we choose an axial-vector like and a pseudoscalar like current. Our results show that the procedure of eliminating negative parity partners is not well suited for the case at hand and that the second approach using structures with highest powers of $p_+$ with an axial-vector like interpolating current gives the most reliable results. Our predictions are based on the models obtained in \cite{Anikin:2015ita,Braun:2014wpa}. The largest uncertainty comes from the uncertainty of the twist 4 parameters $η_{10},\,η_{11}$ and we take the spread between the two models in \cite{Anikin:2015ita} as a measure for this. We get \begin{eqnarray} Γ(Λ_b\to N^*(1535) l ν)&=&\left(0.0058^{+0.0010}_{-0.0009}\right)\cdot\left(\dfrac{V_{ub}}{3.5\cdot10^{-3}}\right)^2,\quad\mbox{LCSR(1)} \nonumber Γ(Λ_b\to N^*(1535) l ν)&=&\left(0.00070^{+0.00012}_{-0.00011}\right)\cdot\left(\dfrac{V_{ub}}{3.5\cdot10^{-3}}\right)^2,\quad\mbox{LCSR(2)} \nonumber Γ(Λ_c\to N^*(1535) l ν)&=&\left(0.0064^{+0.0012}_{-0.0011}\right)\cdot \left(\dfrac{V_{cd}}{0.225}\right)^2,\quad\mbox{LCSR(1)}\nonumber Γ(Λ_c\to N^*(1535) l ν)&=&\left(0.00077^{+0.00016}_{-0.00014}\right)\cdot \left(\dfrac{V_{cd}}{0.225}\right)^2,\quad\mbox{LCSR(2)}\nonumber \end{eqnarray} as predictions for the respective decay widths, where LCSR(1) and LCSR(2) refer to the two different models of the distribution amplitudes of the $N^*$. It is seen that even a rough measurement of these decays will greatly help to discriminate different models.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.