Paper detail

The Debris Disk of Vega: A Steady-State Collisional Cascade, Naturally

It has been argued that the photometric data and images of the archetypical debris disk around Vega may be in contradiction with the standard, steady-state collisional scenario of the disk evolution. Here we perform physical modeling of the Vega disk "from the sources". We assume that dust is maintained by a "Kuiper belt" of parent planetesimals at ~ 100 AU and employ our collisional and radiative transfer codes to consistently model the size and radial distribution of the disk material and then thermal emission of dust. In doing so, we vary a broad set of parameters, including the stellar properties, the exact location, extension, and dynamical excitation of the planetesimal belt, chemical composition of solids, and the collisional prescription. We are able to reproduce the spectral energy distribution in the entire wavelength range from the near-infrared to millimeter, as well as the mid-IR and sub-millimeter radial brightness profiles of the Vega disk. Thus our results suggest that the Vega disk observations are compatible with a steady-state collisional dust production, and we put important constraints on the disk parameters and physical processes that sustain it. The total disk mass in < 100 km-sized bodies is estimated to be ~ 10 Earth masses. Provided that collisional cascade has been operating over much of the Vega age of ~ 350 Myr, the disk must have lost a few Earth masses of solids during that time. We also demonstrate that using an intermediate luminosity of the star between the pole and the equator, as derived from its fast rotation, is required to reproduce the debris disk observations. Finally, we show that including cratering collisions into the model is mandatory.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.