Paper detail

The data arrangement problem on binary trees

The data arrangement problem on regular trees (DAPT) consists in assigning the vertices of a given graph G, called the guest graph, to the leaves of a d-regular tree T, called the host graph, such that the sum of the pairwise distances of all pairs of leaves in T which correspond to the edges of G is minimised. Luczak and Noble have shown that this problem is NP-hard for every fixed d greater than or equal to 2. In this paper we show that the DAPT remains NP-hard even if the guest graph is a tree, an issue which was posed as an open question in by Luczak and Noble. We deal with a special case of the DAPT where both the guest and the host graph are binary regular trees and provide a 1.015-approximation algorithm for this special case. The solution produced by the algorithm and the corresponding value of the objective function are given in closed form. The analysis of the approximation algorithm involves an auxiliary problem which is interesting on its own, namely the k-balanced partitioning problem (kBPP) for binary regular trees and particular choices of k. We derive a lower bound for the later problem and obtain a lower bound for the original problem by solving hG instances of the k-BPP, where hG is the height of the host graph G.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.