Paper detail

The Dark Matter Distribution in the Central Regions of Galaxy Clusters: Implications for CDM

We have undertaken a spectroscopic survey of gravitational arcs in a carefully chosen sample of six clusters each containing a dominant brightest cluster galaxy. We use these systems to study the relative distributions of dark and baryonic material in the central regions. Three clusters present both radial and tangential arcs and provide particularly strong constraints on the mass profiles, whereas the other three display only tangential arcs and act as a control set. We analyze stellar velocity dispersion data for the brightest cluster galaxies in conjunction with the arc redshifts and lens models to constrain the dark and baryonic mass profiles jointly. For the systems containing radial arcs we find that the inner dark matter density profile is consistent with a 3-D distribution, rho_{DM} propto r^-beta, with logarithmic slope <beta>=0.52^{+0.05}_{-0.05} (68% CL). Similarly, we find that the tangential arc sample gives an upper limit, beta<0.57 (99% CL). Taking the 6 clusters together, the mean dark matter distribution is quite inconsistent with the standard Navarro, Frenk & White (1997) value, beta=1.0, at >99% confidence. In addition, we find considerable cosmic scatter in the beta (Delta beta ~0.3) values of the radial arc sample. We find no evidence that systems with radial arcs preferentially yield flatter dark matter profiles as might be expected if they were a biased subset. We discuss the validity of our 1-D mass reconstruction method and verify its conclusions by comparing with results of a more rigorous ray-tracing lensing code. Our results extend and strengthen the earlier conclusions presented by Sand et al. (2002) and suggest the relationship between dark and visible matter in the cores of clusters is more complex than anticipated from recent simulations. (abridged)

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.