Paper detail

The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview

This overview article describes the legacy prospect and discovery potential of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) beyond cosmological studies, illustrating it with examples from the DES early data. DES is using a wide-field camera (DECam) on the 4m Blanco Telescope in Chile to image 5000 sq deg of the sky in five filters (grizY). By its completion the survey is expected to have generated a catalogue of 300 million galaxies with photometric redshifts and 100 million stars. In addition, a time-domain survey search over 27 sq deg is expected to yield a sample of thousands of Type Ia supernovae and other transients. The main goals of DES are to characterise dark energy and dark matter, and to test alternative models of gravity; these goals will be pursued by studying large scale structure, cluster counts, weak gravitational lensing and Type Ia supernovae. However, DES also provides a rich data set which allows us to study many other aspects of astrophysics. In this paper we focus on additional science with DES, emphasizing areas where the survey makes a difference with respect to other current surveys. The paper illustrates, using early data (from `Science Verification', and from the first, second and third seasons of observations), what DES can tell us about the solar system, the Milky Way, galaxy evolution, quasars, and other topics. In addition, we show that if the cosmological model is assumed to be Lambda+ Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) then important astrophysics can be deduced from the primary DES probes. Highlights from DES early data include the discovery of 34 Trans Neptunian Objects, 17 dwarf satellites of the Milky Way, one published z > 6 quasar (and more confirmed) and two published superluminous supernovae (and more confirmed).

preprint2016arXivOpen access
Dark Energy Survey CollaborationT. AbbottF. B. AbdallaJ. AleksicS. AllamA. AmaraD. BaconE. BalbinotM. BanerjiK. BechtolA. Benoit-LevyG. M. BernsteinE. BertinJ. BlazekC. BonnettS. BridleD. BrooksR. J. BrunnerE. Buckley-GeerD. L. BurkeG. B. CaminhaD. CapozziJ. CarlsenA. Carnero-RosellM. CarolloM. Carrasco-KindJ. CarreteroF. J. CastanderL. ClerkinT. CollettC. ConseliceM. CrocceC. E. CunhaC. B. D'AndreaL. N. da CostaT. M. DavisS. DesaiH. T. DiehlJ. P. DietrichS. DodelsonP. DoelA. Drlica-WagnerJ. EstradaJ. EtheringtonA. E. EvrardJ. FabbriD. A. FinleyB. FlaugherR. J. FoleyP. RosalbaJ. FriemanJ. Garcia-BellidoE. GaztanagaD. W. GerdesT. GiannantonioD. A. GoldsteinD. GruenR. A. GruendlP. GuarnieriG. GutierrezW. HartleyK. HonscheidB. JainD. J. JamesT. JeltemaS. JouvelR. KesslerA. KingD. KirkR. KronK. KuehnN. KuropatkinO. LahavT. S. LiM. LimaH. LinM. A. G. MaiaM. MaklerM. ManeraC. MarastonJ. L. MarshallP. MartiniR. G. McMahonP. MelchiorA. MersonC. J. MillerR. MiquelJ. J. MohrX. Morice-AtkinsonK. NaidooE. NeilsenR. C. NicholB. NordR. OgandoF. OstrovskiA. PalmeseA. PapadopoulosH. PeirisJ. PeoplesW. J. PercivalA. A. PlazasS. L. ReedA. RefregierA. K. RomerA. RoodmanA. RossE. RozoE. S. RykoffI. SadehM. SakoC. SanchezE. SanchezB. SantiagoV. ScarpineM. SchubnellI. Sevilla-NoarbeE. SheldonM. SmithR. C. SmithM. Soares-SantosF. SobreiraM. SoumagnacE. SuchytaM. SullivanM. SwansonG. TarleJ. ThalerD. ThomasR. C. ThomasD. TuckerJ. D. VieiraV. VikramA. R. WalkerR. H. WechslerJ. WellerW. WesterL. WhitewayH. WilcoxB. YannyY. ZhangJ. Zuntz

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access141 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Dark Energy Survey CollaborationT. AbbottF. B. AbdallaJ. AleksicS. AllamA. AmaraD. BaconE. BalbinotM. BanerjiK. BechtolA. Benoit-LevyG. M. BernsteinE. BertinJ. BlazekC. BonnettS. BridleD. BrooksR. J. BrunnerE. Buckley-GeerD. L. BurkeG. B. CaminhaD. CapozziJ. CarlsenA. Carnero-RosellM. CarolloM. Carrasco-KindJ. CarreteroF. J. CastanderL. ClerkinT. CollettC. ConseliceM. CrocceC. E. CunhaC. B. D'AndreaL. N. da CostaT. M. DavisS. DesaiH. T. DiehlJ. P. DietrichS. DodelsonP. DoelA. Drlica-WagnerJ. EstradaJ. EtheringtonA. E. EvrardJ. FabbriD. A. FinleyB. FlaugherR. J. FoleyP. RosalbaJ. FriemanJ. Garcia-BellidoE. GaztanagaD. W. GerdesT. GiannantonioD. A. GoldsteinD. GruenR. A. GruendlP. GuarnieriG. GutierrezW. HartleyK. HonscheidB. JainD. J. JamesT. JeltemaS. JouvelR. KesslerA. KingD. KirkR. KronK. KuehnN. KuropatkinO. LahavT. S. LiM. LimaH. LinM. A. G. MaiaM. MaklerM. ManeraC. MarastonJ. L. MarshallP. MartiniR. G. McMahonP. MelchiorA. MersonC. J. MillerR. MiquelJ. J. MohrX. Morice-AtkinsonK. NaidooE. NeilsenR. C. NicholB. NordR. OgandoF. OstrovskiA. PalmeseA. PapadopoulosH. PeirisJ. PeoplesW. J. PercivalA. A. PlazasS. L. ReedA. RefregierA. K. RomerA. RoodmanA. RossE. RozoE. S. RykoffI. SadehM. SakoC. SanchezE. SanchezB. SantiagoV. ScarpineM. SchubnellI. Sevilla-NoarbeE. SheldonM. SmithR. C. SmithM. Soares-SantosF. SobreiraM. SoumagnacE. SuchytaM. SullivanM. SwansonG. TarleJ. ThalerD. ThomasR. C. ThomasD. TuckerJ. D. VieiraV. VikramA. R. WalkerR. H. WechslerJ. WellerW. WesterL. WhitewayH. WilcoxB. YannyY. ZhangJ. Zuntz

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.