Paper detail

The Crab Nebula and the class of Type IIn-P supernovae caused by sub-energetic electron capture explosions

What sort of supernova gave rise to the Crab Nebula? There are several indications that the Crab arose from a sub-energetic explosion of an 8-10 Msun star, this appears to conflict with the high luminosity indicated by historical observations. This paper shows that several properties of the Crab are best suited to Type IIn-P explosions (Type IIn spectra with plateau light curves). These events probably arise from relatively low-energy (1e50 erg) explosions with low 56Ni yield resulting from electron-capture SNe (ecSNe), but their high luminosity and Type IIn spectra are dominated by shock interaction with CSM. After about 120 days, nearly all of the mass in the CSM and ejecta ends up in a slow dense shell. In the scenario proposed here for SN1054, this thin shell is accelerated by the growing pulsar wind nebula, producing the complex network of filaments seen today. There is no need to invoke the invisible fast SN envelope hypothesized to reside outside the Crab. SNeIIn-P explain several observed features of the Crab: (1) No blast wave or rapidly expanding SN envelope outside the filaments, (2) a total mass of 5 Msun swept up in a thin shell, (3) a high peak luminosity despite the low kinetic energy, and (4) chemical abundances consistent with an 8-10 Msun star and low 56Ni yield. A number of other implications are discussed, concerning other Crab-like remnants, dust in the Crab filaments, diversity in the initial masses of SNe IIn, and an association between ecSNe and SN impostors. This model predicts that if light echoes from SN1054 are discovered, they will be consistent with a Type IIn-P spectrum.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.