Paper detail

The Countable Admissible Ordinal Equivalence Relation

Let $F_{ω_1}$ be the countable admissible ordinal equivalence relation defined on ${}^ω2$ by $x \ F_{ω_1} \ y$ if and only if $ω_1^x = ω_1^y$. It will be shown that $F_{ω_1}$ is classifiable by countable structures and must be classified by structures of high Scott rank. If $E$ and $F$ are equivalence relations, then $E$ is almost Borel reducible to $F$ if and only if there is a Borel reduction of $E$ to $F$, except possibly on countably many $E$-classes. Let $E_{ω_1}$ denote the equivalence of order types of reals coding well-orderings. It will be shown that in the constructible universe $L$ and set generic extensions of $L$, $E_{ω_1}$ is not almost Borel reducible to $F_{ω_1}$, although a result of Zapletal implies such an almost Borel reduction exists if there is a measurable cardinal. Lastly, it will be shown that the isomorphism relation induced by a counterexample to Vaught's conjecture cannot be Borel reducible to $F_{ω_1}$ in $L$ and set generic extensions of $L$. This shows the consistency of a negative answer to a question of Sy-David Friedman.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.