Paper detail

The Cost of Mitigating Power Law Delay in Random Access Networks

Exponential backoff (EB) is a widely adopted collision resolution mechanism in many popular random-access networks including Ethernet and wireless LAN (WLAN). The prominence of EB is primarily attributed to its asymptotic throughput stability, which ensures a non-zero throughput even when the number of users in the network goes to infinity. Recent studies, however, show that EB is fundamentally unsuitable for applications that are sensitive to large delay and delay jitters, as it induces divergent second- and higher-order moments of medium access delay. Essentially, the medium access delay follows a power law distribution, a subclass of heavy-tailed distribution. To understand and alleviate the issue, this paper systematically analyzes the tail delay distribution of general backoff functions, with EB being a special case. In particular, we establish a tradeoff between the tail decaying rate of medium access delay distribution and the stability of throughput. To be more specific, convergent delay moments are attainable only when the backoff functions $g(k)$ grows slower than exponential functions, i.e., when $g(k)\in o(r^k)$ for all $r>1$. On the other hand, non-zero asymptotic throughput is attainable only when backoff functions grow at least as fast as an exponential function, i.e., $g(k)\inΩ(r^k)$ for some $r>1$. This implies that bounded delay moments and stable throughput cannot be achieved at the same time. For practical implementation, we show that polynomial backoff (PB), where $g(k)$ is a polynomial that grows slower than exponential functions, obtains finite delay moments and good throughput performance at the same time within a practical range of user population. This makes PB a better alternative than EB for multimedia applications with stringent delay requirements.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.