Paper detail

The Cost of Deterministic, Adaptive, Automatic Algorithms: Cones, Not Balls

Automatic numerical algorithms attempt to provide approximate solutions that differ from exact solutions by no more than a user-specified error tolerance. The computational cost is often determined \emph{adaptively} by the algorithm based on the function values sampled. While adaptive, automatic algorithms are widely used in practice, most lack \emph{guarantees}, i.e., conditions on input functions that ensure that the error tolerance is met. This article establishes a framework for guaranteed, adaptive, automatic algorithms. Sufficient conditions for success and two-sided bounds on the computational cost are provided in Theorems \ref{TwoStageDetermThm} and \ref{MultiStageThm}. Lower bounds on the complexity of the problem are given in Theorem \ref{complowbd}, and conditions under which the proposed algorithms have optimal order are given in Corollary \ref{optimcor}. These general theorems are illustrated for univariate numerical integration and function recovery via adaptive algorithms based on linear splines. The key to these adaptive algorithms is performing the analysis for \emph{cones} of input functions rather than balls. Cones provide a setting where adaption may be beneficial.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.