Paper detail

The Cost of 2-Distinguishing Hypercubes

A graph $G$ is said to be {\it $2$-distinguishable} if there is a labeling of the vertices with two labels so that only the trivial automorphism preserves the labels. The minimum size of a label class, over all 2-distinguishing labelings, is called the {\it cost of $2$-distinguishing}, denoted by $ρ(G)$. For $n\geq 4$ the hypercubes $Q_n$ are 2-distinguishable, but the values for $ρ(Q_n)$ have been elusive, with only bounds and partial results previously known. This paper settles the question. The main result can be summarized as: for $n\geq 4$, $ρ(Q_n) \in \{1+\lceil \log_2 n \rceil, 2 + \lceil \log_2 n\rceil\}$. Exact values are be found using a recursive relationship involving a new parameter $ν_m$, the smallest integer for which $ρ(Q_{ν_m})=m$. The main result is\begin{gather*} 4\leq n \leq 12\Longrightarrow ρ(Q_n)=5, \text{ and } 5\leq m \leq 11 \Longrightarrow ν_m=4; \\ \text{ for } m\geq 6, ρ(Q_n) = m \iff 2^{m-2} - ν_{m-1} + 1 \leq n \leq 2^{m-1}-ν_m; \\ \text{ for } n\geq 5, ν_m = n \iff 2^{n-1} - ρ(Q_{n-1}) + 1\leq m \leq 2^{n}-ρ(Q_n).\end{gather*}

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.