Paper detail

The CosmoQuest Moon Mappers Community Science Project: The Effect of Incidence Angle on the Lunar Surface Crater Distribution

The CosmoQuest virtual community science platform facilitates the creation and implementation of astronomical research projects performed by citizen scientists. One such project, called Moon Mappers, aids in determining the feasibility of producing crowd-sourced cratering statistics of the surface of the Moon. Lunar crater population statistics are an important metric used to understand the formation and evolutionary history of lunar surface features, to estimate relative and absolute model ages of regions on the Moon's surface, and to establish chronologies for other planetary surfaces via extrapolation from the lunar record. It has been suggested and shown that solar incidence angle has an effect on the identification of craters, particularly at meter scales. We have used high-resolution image data taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter's Narrow-Angle Camera of the Apollo 15 landing site over a range of solar incidence angles and have compiled catalogs of crater identifications obtained by minimally trained members of the general public participating in CosmoQuest's Moon Mappers project. We have studied the effects of solar incidence angle spanning from approximately 27.5 deg to approximately 83 deg (extending the incidence angle range examined in previous works), down to a minimum crater size of 10 m, and find that the solar incidence angle has a significant effect on the crater identification process, as has been determined by subject matter experts in other studies. The results of this analysis not only highlight the ability to use crowd-sourced data in reproducing and validating scientific analyses but also indicate the potential to perform original research.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.