Paper detail

The cosmological lens equation and the equivalent single-plane gravitational lens

The gravitational lens equation resulting from a single (non-linear) mass concentration (the main lens) plus inhomogeneities of the large-scale structure is shown to be strictly equivalent to the single-plane gravitational lens equation without the cosmological perturbations. The deflection potential (and, by applying the Poisson equation, also the mass distribution) of the equivalent single-plane lens is derived. If the main lens is described by elliptical isopotential curves plus a shear term, the equivalent single-plane lens will be of the same form. Due to the equivalence shown, the determination of the Hubble constant from time delay measurements is affected by the same mass-sheet invariance transformation as for the single-plane lens. If the lens strength is fixed (e.g., by measuring the velocity dispersion of stars in the main lens), the determination of $H_0$ is affected by inhomogeneous matter between us and the lens. The orientation of the mass distribution relative to the image positions is the same for the cosmological lens situation and the single-plane case. In particular this implies that cosmic shear cannot account for a misalignment of the observed galaxy orientation relative to the best-fitting lens model.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.