Paper detail

The Cosmological Evolution of Blazars and the Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background in the Fermi Era

The latest determination of the extragalactic gamma-ray background (EGRB) radiation by Fermi is compared with the theoretical prediction of the blazar component by Inoue & Totani (2009; hereafter IT09). The Fermi EGRB spectrum is in excellent agreement with IT09, indicating that blazars are the dominant component of the EGRB, and contributions from any other sources (e.g., dark matter annihilations) are minor. It also indicates that the blazar SED (spectral energy distribution) sequence taken into account in IT09 is a valid description of mean blazar SEDs. The possible contribution of MeV blazars to the EGRB in the MeV band is also discussed. In five total years of observations, we predict that Fermi will detect ~1200 blazars all sky down to the corresponding sensitivity limit. We also address the detectability of the highest-redshift blazars. Updating our model with regard to high-redshift evolution based on SDSS quasar data, we show that Fermi may find some blazars up to z~6 during the five-year survey. Such blazars could provide a new probe of early star and galaxy formation through GeV spectral attenuation signatures induced by high-redshift UV background radiation.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.