Paper detail

The cosmic evolution of the stellar mass$-$velocity dispersion relation of early-type galaxies

We study the evolution of the observed correlation between central stellar velocity dispersion $σ_\mathrm{e}$ and stellar mass $M_*$ of massive ($M_*\gtrsim 3\times 10^{10}\,\mathrm{M_\odot}$) early-type galaxies (ETGs) out to redshift $z\approx 2.5$, exploiting a Bayesian hierarchical inference formalism. Collecting ETGs from state-of-the-art literature samples, we build a $fiducial$ sample ($0\lesssim z\lesssim 1$), which is obtained with homogeneous selection criteria, but also a less homogeneous $extended$ sample ($0\lesssim z\lesssim 2.5$). Based on the fiducial sample, we find that the $M_*$-$σ_\mathrm{e}$ relation is well represented by $σ_\mathrm{e}\propto M_*^β(1+z)^ζ$, with $β\simeq 0.18$ independent of redshift and $ζ\simeq 0.4$ (at given $M_*$, $σ_\mathrm{e}$ decreases for decreasing $z$, for instance by a factor of $\approx1.3$ from $z=1$ to $z=0$). When the slope $β$ is allowed to evolve, we find it increasing with redshift: $β(z)\simeq 0.16+0.26\log(1+z)$ describes the data as well as constant $β\simeq 0.18$. The intrinsic scatter of the $M_*$-$σ_\mathrm{e}$ relation is $\simeq0.08$ dex in $σ_\mathrm{e}$ at given $M_*$, independent of redshift. Our results suggest that, on average, the velocity dispersion of $individual$ massive ($M_*\gtrsim 3\times 10^{11}\,M_\odot$) ETGs decreases with time while they evolve from $z\approx 1$ to $z\approx 0$. The analysis of the extended sample leads to results similar to that of the fiducial sample, with slightly stronger redshift dependence of the normalisation ($ζ\simeq 0.5$) and weaker redshift dependence of the slope (${\rm d} β/{\rm d} \log (1+z)\simeq 0.18$) when $β$ varies with time. At $z=2$ ETGs with $M_*\approx 10^{11}\,M_\odot$ have, on average, $\approx1.7$ higher $σ_\mathrm{e}$ than ETGs of similar stellar mass at $z=0$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.