Paper detail

The cosmic evolution of massive black holes and galaxy spheroids: global constraints at redshift z<~1.2

We study the observational constraints on the cosmic evolution of the relationships between the massive black hole (MBH) mass (M_bh) and the stellar mass (M^*_sph; or velocity dispersion σ) of the host galaxy/spheroid. Assuming that the M_bh-M^*_sph (or M_bh-σ) relation evolves with redshift as \propto (1+z)^Γ, the MBH mass density can be obtained from either the observationally determined galaxy stellar mass functions or velocity dispersion distribution functions over redshift z~0-1.2 for any given Γ. The MBH mass density at different redshifts can also be inferred from the luminosity function of QSOs/AGNs provided known radiative efficiency ε. By matching the MBH density inferred from galaxies to that obtained from QSOs/AGNs, we find that Γ=0.64^{+0.27}_{-0.29} for the M_bh-M^*_sph relation and Γ=-0.21^{+0.28}_{-0.33} for the M_bh-σrelation, and ε=0.11^{+0.04}_{-0.03}. Our results suggest that the MBH mass growth precedes the bulge mass growth but the galaxy velocity dispersion does not increase with the mass growth of the bulge after the quench of nuclear activity, which is roughly consistent with the two-phase galaxy formation scenario proposed by Oser et al. (2012) in which a galaxy roughly double its masses after z=1 due to accretion and minor mergers while its velocity dispersion drops slightly.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.