Paper detail

The Cores of the Fe K$α$ Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei: an Extended Chandra High Energy Grating Sample

We extend the study of the core of the Fe K$α$ emission line at \sim 6.4 keV in Seyfert galaxies reported in Yaqoob & Padmanabhan (2004) using a larger sample observed by the Chandra High Energy Grating (HEG). Whilst heavily obscured active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are excluded from the sample, these data offer some of the highest precision measurements of the peak energy of the Fe K$α$ line, and the highest spectral resolution measurements of the width of the core of the line in unobscured and moderately obscured ($N_{H}<10^{23} \ \rm cm^{-2}$) Seyfert galaxies to date. The Fe K$α$ line is detected in 33 sources, and its centroid energy is constrained in 32 sources. In 27 sources the statistical quality of the data is good enough to yield measurements of the FWHM. We find that the distribution in the line centroid energy is strongly peaked around the value for neutral Fe, with over 80% of the observations giving values in the range 6.38--6.43 keV. Including statistical errors, 30 out of 32 sources ($\sim 94%$) have a line centroid energy in the range 6.35--6.47 keV. The mean equivalent width, amongst the observations in which a non-zero lower limit could be measured, was $53 \pm 3eV. The mean FWHM from the subsample of 27 sources was $2060 \pm 230 \ \rm km \ s^{-1}$. The mean EW and FWHM are somewhat higher when multiple observations for a given source are averaged. From a comparison with the H$β$ optical emission-line widths (or, for one source, Br$α$), we find that there is no universal location of the Fe K$α$ line-emitting region relative to the optical BLR. We confirm the presence of the X-ray Baldwin effect, an anti-correlation between the Fe K$α$ line EW and X-ray continuum luminosity. The HEG data have enabled isolation of this effect to the narrow core of the Fe K$α$ line.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.