Paper detail

The Conway Polynomial and Amphicheiral Knots

According to work of Hartley and Kawauchi in 1979 and 1980, the Conway Polynomial of all negative amphicheiral knots and strongly positive amphicheiral knots factors as $ϕ(z)ϕ(-z)$ for some $ϕ(z)\in\mathbb Z[z]$. Moreover, a 2012 example due to Ermotti, Hongler and Weber shows that this is not true for general amphicheiral knots. On the other hand, in 2006 the first author made a conjecture equivalent to saying that the Conway polynomial of all amphicheiral knots splits as $ϕ(z)ϕ(-z)$ in the ring $\mathbb Z_4[z]$. In this paper, we establish this conjecture for all periodically amphicheiral knots built from braids, where the period preserves the braid structure. We also give counterexamples to conjectures on the leading coefficient of the Conway polynomial of an amphicheiral knot due to Stoimenow.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.