Paper detail

The convergence of EAS radio emission models and a detailed comparison of REAS3 and MGMR simulations

Over the previous decade, many approaches for the modelling of radio emission from cosmic ray air showers have been developed. However, there remained significant deviations between the models, reaching from important qualitative differences such as unipolar versus bipolar pulses to large variations in the predicted absolute amplitudes of up to factors of 20. Only recently, it has been realized that in the many models predicting unipolar pulses, a radio emission contribution due to the time-variation of the number of charged particles or, equivalently, the acceleration of the particles at the beginning and the end of their trajectories, had not been taken into account. We discuss here the nature of the underlying problem and demonstrate that by including the missing contribution in REAS3, the discrepancies are reconciled. Furthermore, we show a direct comparison of REAS3 and MGMR simulations for a set of prototype showers. The results of these two completely independent and very different modelling approaches show a good level of agreement except for regions of parameter space where differences in the underlying air shower model become important. This is the first time that two radio emission models show such close concordance, illustrating that the modelling of radio emission from extensive air showers has indeed made a true breakthrough.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.