Paper detail

The convective Urca process

One possible fate of an accreting white dwarf is explosion in a type Ia supernova. However, the route to the thermonuclear runaway has always been uncertain owing to the lack of a convective model consistent with the Urca process. We derive a formalism for convective motions involving two radial flows. This formalism provides a framework for convective models that guarantees self-consistency for chemistry and energy budget, allows time-dependence and describes the interaction of convective motions with the global contraction or expansion of the star. In the one-stream limit, we reproduce several already existing convective models and allow them to treat chemistry. We also suggest as a model easy to implement in a stellar evolution code. We apply this formalism to convective Urca cores in Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs. We stress that in degenerate matter, nuclear reactions that change the number of electrons strongly influence the convective velocities. We point out the sensitivity of the energy budget on the mixing. We illustrate our model by computing {\it stationary} convective cores with Urca nuclei. We show that even a very small mass fraction of Urca nuclei ($10^{-8}$) strongly influences the convective velocities. Finally, we present preliminary computations of the late evolution of a close to Chandrasekhar mass C+O white dwarf including the convective Urca process.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.