Paper detail

The Contribution of the Obscuring Torus to the X--Ray Spectrum of Seyfert Galaxies: A Test for the Unification Model

The presence of an obscuring torus around the nucleus of Seyfert galaxies, as supposed in the popular unification scheme, can strongly modify the X--ray spectrum for both type 1 and 2 Seyfert galaxies. We find that if the torus is Compton thick, it can scatter at small angles a significant fraction of the nuclear radiation, and contribute to the continuum of Seyfert 1 galaxies above $\sim$10 keV, and to the fluorescence iron line at 6.4 keV. At large inclination angles and for large torus column densities, the spectrum is attenuated by photoabsorption and Compton scattering, while the iron fluorescence line produced by the torus can have large equivalent widths. Even after dilution by the continuum scattered by the warm material outside the torus, this iron line could be strong enough to explain the ``cold" component in the spectrum of NGC 1068. We stress that the complex pattern of the predicted variability can be a powerful tool for constraining the parameters of the model, such as the column density of the torus, its inclination and the amount of warm scattering material.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.