Paper detail

The contribution of the IGM and minihalos to the 21 cm signal of reionization

We study the statistical properties of the cosmological 21 cm signal from both the intergalactic medium (IGM) and minihalos, using a reionization simulation that includes a self--consistent treatment of minihalo photoevaporation. We consider two models for minihalo formation and three typical thermal states of the IGM -- heating purely by ionization, heating from both ionizing and $\rm Lyα$ photons, and a maximal "strong heating" model. We find that the signal from the IGM is almost always dominant over that from minihalos. In our calculation, the differential brightness temperature, $δT_b,$ of minihalos is never larger than 2 mK. Although there are indeed some differences in the signals from the minihalos and from the IGM, even with the planned generation of radio telescopes it will be unfeasible to detect them. However, minihalos significantly affect the ionization state of the IGM and the corresponding 21 cm flux.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.