Paper detail

The contribution of local variations in hue or contrast to symmetry of things in a thing

Symmetry contributes to processes of perceptual organization in biological vision and influences the quality and time of goal directed decision making in animals and humans, as discussed in recent work on the examples of symmetry of things in a thing and bilateral shape symmetry. The present study was designed to show that selective chromatic variations in geometric shape configurations with mirror symmetry can be exploited to highlight functional properties of symmetry of things in a thing in human vision. The experimental procedure uses a psychophysical two alternative forced choice technique, where human observers have to decide as swiftly as possible whether two shapes presented simultaneously on a computer screen are symmetrical or not. The stimuli are computer generated 2D shape configurations consisting of multiple elements, with and without systematic variations in local color, color saturation, or achromatic contrast producing variations in symmetry of things in a thing. All stimulus pairs presented had perfect geometric mirror symmetry. The results show that varying the color of local shape elements selectively in multichromatic and monochromatic shapes significantly slows down perceptual response times, which are a direct measure of stimulus uncertainty. It is concluded that local variations in hue or contrast produce functionally meaningful variations in symmetry of things in thing, revealed here as a relevant perceptual variable in symmetry detection. Disturbance of the latter increases stimulus uncertainty and thereby affects the perceptual salience of mirror symmetry in the time course for goal relevant human decisions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.