Paper detail

The $τ$-contamination of the golden muon sample at the Neutrino Factory

We study the contribution of $ν_e \to ν_τ\to τ\to μ$ transitions to the wrong-sign muon sample of the {\em golden} channel of the Neutrino Factory. Muons from tau decays are not really a background, since they contain information from the oscillation signal, and represent a small fraction of the sample. However, if not properly handled they introduce serious systematic error, in particular if the detector/analysis are sensitive to muons of low energy. This systematic effect is particularly troublesome for large $θ_{13} \geq 1^\circ$ and prevents the use of the Neutrino Factory as a precision facility for large $θ_{13}$. Such systematic error disappears if the tau contribution to the golden muon sample is taken into account. The fact that the fluxes of the Neutrino Factory are exactly calculable permits the knowledge of the tau sample due to the $ν_e \to ν_τ$ oscillation. We then compute the contribution to the muon sample arising from this sample {\em in terms of the apparent muon energy}. This requires the computation of a migration matrix $M_{ij}$ which describes the contributions of the tau neutrinos of a given energy $E_i$, to the muon neutrinos of an apparent energy $E_j$. We demonstrate that applying $M_{ij}$ to the data permits the full correction of the otherwise intolerable systematic error.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.